I am an owner of a Carlson Sparrow and an MXL Sport. I am currently looking for a Kolb Firestar or Fierfly. Prefere one in flying condition. Please not a basket case. Any info would be appreciated. |
__._,_.___
There a still lots of single seaters out there that don't qualify as ultralight because of the weight but ARE being "flown as ultralight" .
I didn't ask if it was a legal UL, only if he intended to "fly it AS an ultralight." ;-)
IIRR some of the earlier ones with lighter engines might have actually stayed within the legal UL weight limit.
Optional engine for FAR Part 103 aircraft (and possibly even some larger / heavier - light sport aircraft). The 36.5 HP Polini Thor 250 Dual Spark, Water Cooled, Aircraft engine weighs 35 to 50 pounds less (+/-) than a Rotax 477 (depending on the Rotax 447 setup), and the 36.5 HP Polini Thor 250 Dual Spark, Water Cooled, Aircraft engine uses substantially less fuel, but has similar power output, and is substantially smoother and quieter than the Rotax 447 (& 503). The 36.5 HP Polini Thor 250 Dual Spark, Water Cooled, Aircraft engine has been very popular with Powered Paraglider ("PPG") pilots for quite a while. Please click on links below for more information.
http://www.polini.com/en/page_719.html
Polini Thor 250 Engine Review -- The best ultralight engine we've seen
Steve
Re Rans S4...
"...like flying a toy Cessna..."With lots's of really important differences... Many desirable , others not.Depends quite in which Cessna you compare to. But let's say a152 or 172.... CIt'll land and take off a fraction of the space a Cessna needs. In 400 feet with room to spare...Actually a slightly better rate of climb.Stall/touch down speed less than half.Fuel consumption about 3.5 gallons per hour of cheap auto gas vs about 7 gallons per hour of liquid gold called avgas.In short... In every way imaginable _Radically_ cheaper to fly and maintain....Except one: being fabric tying it down outside at cheap airstrip monthly fee, or storing unprotected fron sun is really not a viable option as it is with metal aircraft like Cessnas.Depending on your situation that could mean as much as $400 a month for a hanger.The 503 rotax is not known as the worlds most reliable...unless it is meticulously maintained by someone who really knows that engine.
There's lots of info on the web about the characteristics and quirks if the S4 .. Good info for a new owner or new pilot or rebuilder IMO.Brubaker.... Are you hoping to fly it as a ultralight.... No N-number?And what did it cost you..,and how much $$$ do you figure to get it flying?Just curious.Alex
---In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, <frankiebpr@...> wrote :I flew one and is like flying a Toy Cessna.Happy New Year and may all your dreams be realized.Frank/Puerto Rico
Sent from my iPhoneOn Jan 1, 2015, at 9:12 AM, "brubakermal@... [Sport_Aircraft]" <Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com> wrote:were rebuilding a rans s4 I picked up at a estate sale the seller received the plane when he got the house at a tax sale I think it will be fun to fly with a 503 and set up with a tail dragger .
On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:12 AM, "brubakermal@... [Sport_Aircraft]" <Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
were rebuilding a rans s4 I picked up at a estate sale the seller received the plane when he got the house at a tax sale I think it will be fun to fly with a 503 and set up with a tail dragger .
were rebuilding a rans s4 I picked up at a estate sale the seller received the plane when he got the house at a tax sale I think it will be fun to fly with a 503 and set up with a tail dragger .