Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Solid Trainer Aircraft?



I believe it is rated for 1600 Lbs down South but to fit LSA it is 1320 and they took out the back seats.

Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Hobson <wrhobson@aol.com>
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, Oct 13, 2009 7:16 pm
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Solid Trainer Aircraft?



I got a ride in one at Sun N Fun and was very impressed. It fairly LEAPT off the grass runway at South Lakeland with 2 pretty husky guys in it and has a HUGE baggage compartment. (It's about the only plane out there that could accommodate my dog.) It's nicely appointed inside and has yokes (which I prefer).The only down-side I could see was the fact that it's built off-shore. It's hard to identify just how much of the price (new) is devoted to the import duties and transportation costs, but whatever it is the first buyer ends up eating as it's pretty much impossible to get it back on the back-end. I'd be seriously interested if I could find a low-time used one at a good price. Just my two cents.
 
 ----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Solid Trainer Aircraft?

 
Does anyone have experience with the Paradise P-1. It is made in South America. It has been in use there for many years but was changed to make it an LSA up here in the states. It is also all metal.

Bill Bower


-----Original Message-----
From: Helen Woods <Helen_Woods@verizon.net>
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, Oct 13, 2009 4:28 pm
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Solid Trainer Aircraft?

1.  When they crash, they shatter.  (By comparison, we had a student 

cartwheel a Tecnam down the runway and the only thing that broke off was

the gear. Student walked away without a scratch.)

2. Even a little bit of damage is expensive and time consuming to fix.

(A wing ding cost several thousand to fix.)

3. There is no A&P in the entire state of Maryland willing and capable

of doing composite structural work on an LSA.



We have three composite planes all of which have required composite

work, all which we've had to ship out of state, all of which were down

for approximately a year during repairs, all of which cost a small

fortune to repair. Composite LSAs are not suitable in my opinion for

primary training for these reasons. By contrast, on our metal Tecnams,

even the worst bang ups (excluding the aforementioned cartwheel which

was totaled by the insurance company) are fixed in a matter of days.



That being said, we're putting a composite hulled SeaRey on the line. I

think composites are fine for rated and proficient pilots and especially

seaplanes, just not primary training.



Helen





dongeneda2000 wrote:

> And you consider that to be a BAD thing because?

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

> Yahoo! Groups Links

>

>

>

>

>

>







------------------------------------



Yahoo! Groups Links



<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/



<*> Your email settings:

Individual Email | Traditional



<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join

(Yahoo! ID required)



<*> To change settings via email:

mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com

mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com



<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/







__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment