Tuesday, January 5, 2010

RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: SportCruiser flight this weekend



Very good question Abid. But doesn't Rotax still require their approval for the kind of prop mounted and the installation, or forget the warrantee? For older used engines or if you don't care about it I guess you could do whatever you want. That is a good point you make about the ELSA/SLSA value. Being in the busyness what would your opinion be on this one?
 
Are you going to offer ELSA on the Fox? You could take it apart and have the new owner help put it back together again and go ELSA with it. Of course then you would be having to make each one the same and offer the kit for sale.
 
I don't know. I am still lost on a lot of this stuff, now. There was the proposal, and then the result keeps coming. Wow!
 

Gary Orpe

-----Original Message-----
From: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of apollonorthamerica
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:41 PM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: SportCruiser flight this weekend

 

I honestly don't know why people who fly privately would want a S-LSA. That's why there is E-LSA. Put the prop on, set the pitch and ground test for proper RPM and call the FSDO inspector for airworthiness. Viola, you got an E-LSA. Do what you would like.

I think the idea is that S-LSA's will hold their re-sale values. Well have they? compared to E-LSA? I really don't know.
Abid

--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Orpe" <garyo@...> wrote:
>
> When someone speaks of buy an SLSA I assume they know they are not to
> touch it and someone else will have to do the work on it. A few things are
> allowed on some aircraft by the manufacture, who regulates these things,
> not the FAA directly, and the Rotax engine is in a league of its own no
> matter who installed it.
>
> Not true in case of your Sonex, you can, or any A&P can do what ever you
> want to do with it, and still be legal. Such is especially not possible
> with the airframe or the Rotax engine of any SLSA.
>
> Hey if I am wrong on this, please let me know. Heck, I know you will.
>
> Something to consider before you lay out the cash for one. For about 70%
> out there this won't be a problem I would guess.
>
>
> Gary Orpe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of daleandee
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:14 PM
> To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: SportCruiser flight this
> weekend
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I really like the look of the SportCruiser. If it was in the budget
> and flew as well as reported, it would probably be in the hangar. I
> looked at one extensively at the Lumberton, NC air-show one year. They
> offered a ride but I declined as I knew I couldn't afford it and didn't
> want to tie the guys up on a non-sale.
>
> For now I'll continue to fly my Sonex. It is a blast to fly and has a
> lot of good things going for it but it certainly doesn't have that
> cockpit room of the SportCruiser.
>
> Dale
> N28YD
>
> --- In Sport_Aircraft@ <mailto:Sport_Aircraft%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com, Eric Goforth <egoforth@> wrote:
>
> > This Saturday the wife and I flew the SportCruiser around for the
> > day. What an absolute kick in the pants. Fast, easy and has all of
> > the goodies a GA pilot like myself could want in a small cruiser for
> > the wife and I. We are seriously considering picking one up.<SNIP>
>



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment