it as the yoke would allow older pilots who have sniff knees easily
access and egress and the published specs were awesome. I ended up
disappointed though. First thing I found was that the useful load was
100lbs less than published marginalizing its usefulness as a trainer in
a school full of older pilots and older instructors. Next
disappointment was the stalls were aggressive (compared to a Tecnam P92)
which in my experience is what leads to hard student landings and banged
up planes. Third, as was mentioned below, it had poor controllability
in ground effect. The problem isn't the stabilator though. Our Tecnam
Siera has a stabilator and a 22kt demonstrated cross wind component (and
that's an honest number). My guess is the problem is the very small
ailerons and possibly the location along the wing where the stall
develops first. I think larger ailerons and a set of stall strips along
the wing root might take care of this problem but I'm no engineer.
Helen
pwrsport@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
>
> I had the opportunity to fly the Paradise P1 last weekend with the
> dealer here in Phoenix. I came away with mixed feeling. Some
> observations. Good points; first it is all metal and it is build
> around an all steel cage, good passenger protection. It is one of the
> best upholstered planes I have been in if upholstery is high on your
> plus list. Low interior noise level. The fit and finish is good.
> Has a nice storage area behind the seats, be sure you anchor the stuff
> down. The plane has been in production a long time so you won't be
> seeing a redesign coming out like some of our more popular LSA's in
> effort to get it right! Easy in and out and comfy seats. Good
> elevator trim control, but a bit sensitive and some pilots will be
> chasing it around. Effective flaps but the flap handle is clumsily to
> work. Does nice Dutch Rools with good harmony and predictable
> handling. Fairly fast cruise speed. On the down side for me was the
> cockpit felt narrow with two 190lb guys. If you are tall, over six
> feet you head will be very close to the headliner. Visibility out the
> doors is poor as your head sites too high inside; you must bend over
> to look out. Front visibility is fair, but reflection off the
> instrument panel deck on to the windscreen is annoying. The yokes
> block good visibility of the instruments and switches and the same for
> the gauges on the right side, again, annoying to me. Stick controls
> would be much better, but the yokes make for easy entry, not a good
> enough reason. Ground handling is ok, but the dragging brakes are
> noisy unless you ride the brakes while rolling. The intercom sucks,
> very noisy. I think there are better looking planes on the market,
> but beauty is in the eye of the beholder they say.
>
>
>
> And now the unbelievable but true story. The plane incorporates a
> stabliator, (elevator and horizontal stabilizer combination). On a
> demo flight recently the prospective buyer/pilot has a miss approach
> and flair while landing. The plane drifts left and a runway light
> takes off half the stabliator. The entire left side is ripped off.
> The right side remains in tack and functioning. The left gear is also
> bent enough letting the left wing tip dig dirt momentarily. Unknown
> to the occupants despite the loud crash noise the dealer goes full
> throttle for a go-around, crazy! A radio call to the plane stating,
> "Ahh sir, there are thing falling off your airplane" leaves him
> puzzled. The dealer pilot told me the pitch felt a bit stiff, but not
> that much different. The plane does a complete normal go-around and
> landing with half a stabliator. It taxi mode the plane was a bit
> weird he said, wanting to track left and left wing down. Later they
> were in shock when seeing the damage. Amazing; so if you are inclined
> to taking out runway lights, then the P1 may be for you?
>
>
>
> Ed Snyder
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: medicbill@aol.com
> Sent: Oct 13, 2009 10:03 PM
> To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Solid Trainer
> Aircraft?
>
>
>
> Does anyone have experience with the Paradise P-1. It is made in
> South America. It has been in use there for many years but was
> changed to make it an LSA up here in the states. It is also all metal.
>
> Bill Bower
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Helen Woods <Helen_Woods@verizon.net>
> To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tue, Oct 13, 2009 4:28 pm
> Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Solid Trainer
> Aircraft?
>
> 1. When they crash, they shatter. (By comparison, we had a student
>
> cartwheel a Tecnam down the runway and the only thing that broke off was
>
> the gear. Student walked away without a scratch.)
>
> 2. Even a little bit of damage is expensive and time consuming to fix.
>
> (A wing ding cost several thousand to fix.)
>
> 3. There is no A&P in the entire state of Maryland willing and capable
>
> of doing composite structural work on an LSA.
>
>
>
> We have three composite planes all of which have required composite
>
> work, all which we've had to ship out of state, all of which were down
>
> for approximately a year during repairs, all of which cost a small
>
> fortune to repair. Composite LSAs are not suitable in my opinion for
>
> primary training for these reasons. By contrast, on our metal Tecnams,
>
> even the worst bang ups (excluding the aforementioned cartwheel which
>
> was totaled by the insurance company) are fixed in a matter of days.
>
>
>
> That being said, we're putting a composite hulled SeaRey on the line. I
>
> think composites are fine for rated and proficient pilots and especially
>
> seaplanes, just not primary training.
>
>
>
> Helen
>
>
>
>
>
> dongeneda2000 wrote:
>
> > And you consider that to be a BAD thing because?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ------------------------------------
>
> >
>
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/ <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/>
>
>
>
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
>
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join>
>
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
>
>
> mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com?>
>
> mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com?>
>
>
>
> Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
>
>
>
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment