Agreed Jim.
What it all boils down to is the person presenting the application, with a signature attesting that 51% was built by amateurs "under penalty of perjury bla bla bla". And if all the documents are acceptable to the inspector signing off on the whole thing, then it's a done deal. So, a lot of that interpretation comes from that DAR.
Personally I wish they'd keep the "21.191(I)(1)" E-LSA category. All this amateur built nonsense wouldn't have to be dealt with then
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment