Sunday, September 27, 2009

Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Transponders in NORDO aircraft

Actually I found something good. Its not from Oklahoma but its in writing from a local FSDO and hey it would count.
<http://www.fly-ul.com/transponder/Transponder.pdf>

Best,
Abid

--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, "apollonorthamerica" <apollonorthamerica@...> wrote:
>
> Peeing in someone elses pool ... what? huh?
> Someone asked so I answer what I know and that's peeing in someone elses pool . great. Michael Huffman should also then stop peeing pools. Michael, you better stop with that E-LSA course lest it gets considered peeing as well :).
> Abid
>
> --- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, "mikehuckle" <m230683@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >I have also heard of your interpretation (understanding)
> > >but when I called Oklahoma, I got told something different.
> > >I will try it again and see what answer I get this time.
> > >Abid
> >
> > oh... it was verbal?
> > Verbal "interpretations" are hardly worth the paper
> > they're written on.
> > (and paper interpretations are not much better)
> > Best thing is to read the FAR, and make
> > a reasonable interpretation of it.
> >
> > These rules are not new, and as I see it they don't
> > change just because people started to fly with Rotax
> > engines which commonly have a "lighting coil" present.
> >
> > With regards "phoning Oklahoma again",
> > no good can come of that, and as you say,
> > *you* invariably build aircraft *with* engine-driven
> > electrical systems,
> > and it's of negligible interest to you,
> > so let's stop peeing in someone else's pool.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mike
> >
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Transponders in NORDO aircraft

Peeing in someone elses pool ... what? huh?
Someone asked so I answer what I know and that's peeing in someone elses pool . great. Michael Huffman should also then stop peeing pools. Michael, you better stop with that E-LSA course lest it gets considered peeing as well :).
Abid

--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, "mikehuckle" <m230683@...> wrote:
>
>
> >I have also heard of your interpretation (understanding)
> >but when I called Oklahoma, I got told something different.
> >I will try it again and see what answer I get this time.
> >Abid
>
> oh... it was verbal?
> Verbal "interpretations" are hardly worth the paper
> they're written on.
> (and paper interpretations are not much better)
> Best thing is to read the FAR, and make
> a reasonable interpretation of it.
>
> These rules are not new, and as I see it they don't
> change just because people started to fly with Rotax
> engines which commonly have a "lighting coil" present.
>
> With regards "phoning Oklahoma again",
> no good can come of that, and as you say,
> *you* invariably build aircraft *with* engine-driven
> electrical systems,
> and it's of negligible interest to you,
> so let's stop peeing in someone else's pool.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Time Building for Private in a LSA

Just after I sent my note I realized you might have
meant "PPC" instead of "PP".

--Yes, PPC is a much better abbreviation. PP is too often used for Private
Pilot so my bad for creating the confusion.

>Those hours count toward a Commercial Certificate as well. Just
> like balloon, glider, trike, airships, helicopters, etc.
For a Commercial
> airplane, you need 250 hours, 100 of
which must be in powered aircraft of
> which 50 must be in airplanes.
This means the applicant could have 150
> hours of balloon time, 50 hours of trike time,
and 50 hours of airplane time
> and meet the min qualifications.
And of that 50 hours, most of it could be
> in LSA. Not all, because the checkride
is done in a complex aircraft so you'd have to
>have enough complex time to be proficient.
> --Jim

Well... that's pretty amazing, and generous of FAA,
as I understand, to count up to 200 of my
trike hours towards Commercial ASEL.

-- It's the way the reg has always (well, at least for the last 40 years.
haha) been written, but the failure to change the 8710-1 on Sep 1, 2004 made
the issue very confusing to everyone including people at the FAA. I know
there are many people on the list who think that every employee of the FAA
should get the word on something new immediately, and absorb it and be able
to pass it on accurately, but it is a large organization made up of people
and change can be confusing. It takes time, but little by little the new
system works, or is modified. Anyway, I agree that it is excellent news.
One guy I talked to was a little amazed and said something like, "But how
could powered parachute time count towards an airplane commercial?" I said,
"Well, like balloon time counts now." He said, "Good point!" The system is
designed to allow aeronautical experience to count, because it is all
experience. The higher in the rating system you go, the more common it is
to have large varieties of flying experience and for people to get jobs in
an area where they are fairly new. An Army helicopter pilot with a limited
amount of fixed wing time is a pretty common example. What he really has to
do is get some airplane experience and demonstrate proficiency in a complex
airplane. My boys are perfect examples as well. They both have almost 250
hours but it's in a combination of airplanes, trikes, and helicopters. They
don't have enough in any one alone to get a Commercial. And I do hope that
COMM WSC is available someday.

Another potential sticky wicket I see is that "Holder does not meet ICAO
requirements" line. I am hoping that someone does not raise the question of
time accrued by a pilot who is not ICAO qualified counting toward a license
that *is* ICAO. That opens dilemnas like; time logged in a Champ by a
person who holds a Private license counts toward a COMM ASEL. However, if
he lets his medical lapse, he can no longer exercise PP ASEL privileges so
is limited to SP which is not ICAO recognized. Potentially, I could see
someone saying that LSA time accrued while a person is a PP holder in
cat/class only counts towards higher ratings. I hope not. What a logbook
nightmare. I'm just thinking out loud here. As it stands, someone going
for a Private or Commercial will fill out 2 8710's in order to get their
flight time logged into the system and until they get the form fixed, I hope
this actually works. I have a feeling there are going to be a couple of
examiners who will be stumped and need to make a phone call or two to
believe their eyes. (And the applicant holding the paperwork.) I went
through this a couple years ago with the helicopter rating and the examiner
and I couldn't figure it out so we gave it up and didn't put my WSC time
into the system. Since then I added a 747 type rating and blew it off as
well. It was just too hard. But if you need the time to count, it's worth
the effort and Mike Huckle is a perfect example. 50 hours of airplane time
and a checkride and you're a Commercial Pilot. (You can add yourself to the
list of unemployed Comm Pilots. haha)

Jim


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Transponders in NORDO aircraft

>I have also heard of your interpretation (understanding)
>but when I called Oklahoma, I got told something different.
>I will try it again and see what answer I get this time.
>Abid

oh... it was verbal?
Verbal "interpretations" are hardly worth the paper
they're written on.
(and paper interpretations are not much better)
Best thing is to read the FAR, and make
a reasonable interpretation of it.

These rules are not new, and as I see it they don't
change just because people started to fly with Rotax
engines which commonly have a "lighting coil" present.

With regards "phoning Oklahoma again",
no good can come of that, and as you say,
*you* invariably build aircraft *with* engine-driven
electrical systems,
and it's of negligible interest to you,
so let's stop peeing in someone else's pool.


Cheers,
Mike

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Time Building for Private in a LSA

> What you're talking about above is
for "commercial" only... not so?
> For "Private Pilot", the applicant would
need to show his 40 hours in
> Category.
> Eg; an Airplane student wanting a PP Cert
would have to show his 40 hours in
> ASEL,
> His WSC time or helicopter time
>not counting towards the total.

> --61.109 says 40 hrs total, but 20 dual
and 10 solo of that must be in an
> airplane. The other 10 can be in whatever.
Thw entire 40 doesn't need to
> be in category, just 30. I think
it's probably rare that option is
> exercised at the Private level, but
read 61.109(a) closely. So your trike
> time does count.

Good news about the "10 in whatever"!

> Next question:
> What is "PP LSA time"?
> I'm guessing you mean airplane time done while flying a LSA.
> And in that case, surely that time needs no special treatment?...
> Those are "Airplane Hours" which count towards a Comm Certificate?
> (as I see it)
>
> --Sorry, that's the problem with trying to abbreviate.
>I meant Powered Parachute.

Just after I sent my note I realized you might have
meant "PPC" instead of "PP".

>Those hours count toward a Commercial Certificate as well. Just
> like balloon, glider, trike, airships, helicopters, etc.
For a Commercial
> airplane, you need 250 hours, 100 of
which must be in powered aircraft of
> which 50 must be in airplanes.
This means the applicant could have 150
> hours of balloon time, 50 hours of trike time,
and 50 hours of airplane time
> and meet the min qualifications.
And of that 50 hours, most of it could be
> in LSA. Not all, because the checkride
is done in a complex aircraft so you'd have to
>have enough complex time to be proficient.
> --Jim

Well... that's pretty amazing, and generous of FAA,
as I understand, to count up to 200 of my
trike hours towards Commercial ASEL.

Thanks for raising the topic.

Mike

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Avionics Equipment



Another wierd situation exists with the way radars are set up.  They are set to remove ground clutter by having slow moving objects removed from the radar scope.  A UL type aircraft flying into the wind can vanish off of the radar due to its slow ground speed.  It's kind of a UL stealth mode.  Roger


From: Jerry <jself1@carolina.rr.com>
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 11:38:14 PM
Subject: RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Avionics Equipment

 

One limitation of this unit and others is that the aircraft with the transporter is only detected when it is "painted" by radar and replies.  Thus, it the aircraft is too low, behind a mountain, or too far from a radar station, it would to be detected by the unit.

 

Jerry in NC

 

From: Sport_Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:Sport_ Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of James DeWilder
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 1:11 PM
To: Sport_Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Avionics Equipment

 

 

Gary,

I have a unit called "Traffic Watch." It is slightly smaller, width and
height wise, than a cigarette pack and about two inches longer. It is
made in Australia and costs, if my memory serves me correctly, about
$600 eight or so years ago. Here is the URL:

http://www.globalav .com.au/productD etailsSingle. asp?ID=159

Jim

On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 17:58 -0700, Gary Orpe wrote:
>
> Which unit do you have? Most seem pretty pricey now days.
>
>
> Gary O.
> N181RL
> 661 746-4780
>
>
>
> -
>




__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Avionics Equipment



One limitation of this unit and others is that the aircraft with the transporter is only detected when it is “painted” by radar and replies.  Thus, it the aircraft is too low, behind a mountain, or too far from a radar station, it would to be detected by the unit.

 

Jerry in NC

 

From: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of James DeWilder
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 1:11 PM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Avionics Equipment

 

 

Gary,

I have a unit called "Traffic Watch." It is slightly smaller, width and
height wise, than a cigarette pack and about two inches longer. It is
made in Australia and costs, if my memory serves me correctly, about
$600 eight or so years ago. Here is the URL:

http://www.globalav.com.au/productDetailsSingle.asp?ID=159

Jim

On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 17:58 -0700, Gary Orpe wrote:
>
> Which unit do you have? Most seem pretty pricey now days.
>
>
> Gary O.
> N181RL
> 661 746-4780
>
>
>
> -
>



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___