Thursday, March 31, 2011

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group 2011 Sun N Fun - worth watching the deva...



WOW what a mess. Glad I did not go.
 
In a message dated 3/31/2011 3:39:54 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, apollonorthamerica@yahoo.com writes:
http://www.trikepilot.com/videos/view/_12091


__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group 2011 Sun N Fun - worth watching the devastation video

http://www.trikepilot.com/videos/view/_12091

Abid

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group 2011 Georgia LSA Tour

RANS and other light sport brands will do a whirlwind tour of Georgia to bring the planes of choice to those who could not make other events.

see link below for more info

http://www.rans.com/_KITS/NewsPages/Georgia%20LSA%202011.htm

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group sport pilot training in challenger or quicksilver



Well even those new challengers are experimentals, and not SLSAs

--
Bob Comperini


On Mar 30, 2011, at 1:03 AM, Peter Walker <peterwalker58@yahoo.com> wrote:

Hello
2011 Challenger Light Sport XS-50 & XL-65
Peter



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group sport pilot training in challenger or quicksilver



Hello
2011 Challenger Light Sport XS-50 & XL-65
Peter

--- On Wed, 3/30/11, flip33 <kenbrad2002@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: flip33 <kenbrad2002@yahoo.com>
Subject: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group sport pilot training in challenger or quicksilver
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2011, 4:32 PM

 

Hi,

I see that there is a dealer offering sport pilot instruction in his challenger for $95 an hour using his plane. I believe all Quad City Challengers are EXP homebuilt aircraft (unless they fell into the ELSA window).

I also learned of a special exemption for teaching pilots to fly a Sonex. According to a friend of mine, he can charge for training in his experimental Sonex. He is a CFI.

I have always thought that a S-LSA was required for instruction for the sport pilot license. I searched a bit and did not come up with an answer.

What do you folks know about this?

Thanks, Ken



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group sport pilot training in challenger or quicksilver

Hi,

I see that there is a dealer offering sport pilot instruction in his challenger for $95 an hour using his plane. I believe all Quad City Challengers are EXP homebuilt aircraft (unless they fell into the ELSA window).

I also learned of a special exemption for teaching pilots to fly a Sonex. According to a friend of mine, he can charge for training in his experimental Sonex. He is a CFI.

I have always thought that a S-LSA was required for instruction for the sport pilot license. I searched a bit and did not come up with an answer.

What do you folks know about this?

Thanks, Ken

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree



I was just giving a little insight from my travels, friends and experience in China.  Draw from it want you want.   Ed

 


-----Original Message-----
From: apollonorthamerica
Sent: Mar 26, 2011 4:55 PM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

 

Ed,
I am not sure I get the relevance here.
The initial solicitation given that I quoted from was not from any Dreamers looking for my money.
This was a group with Chinese provincial government support and ex-Chinese Airforce high ranking officers leading the project who obviously had enough money to hire a dedicated English speaking Australian consultancy company just to fetch out companies like ours for them and to take the temperature so to speak.

Chinese people liking Americans .. well sure and them wanting to learn English. Of course. Compared to India, Pakistan and others in the region Chinese are lagging far behind in this area so that is understandable. However, that has little effect on Chinese bsuiness and government enterprise.

You say stop buying from China and they will be set back 50 years. Well I grew up right next door to them and I think we Americans think a little bit too much of ourselves. We keep that up and the Asians will kick our arse out the window and we won't even know what hit us and they will do it while serving us with a smile.
Let me ask you, "Can WE stop buying from China or India or Malaysia or Indonesia completely, right now?"
I don't think so.
Abid

Ed Wrote:
Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

I have box full of these. . . Dreamers looking for your money.

China has many internal problems in every life sector you will never hear about. Stop buying Chinese and they go back half a century. The good news is that many in the big cities are now starting to make a little money that brings them some additional freedoms, the more they get, the more they want. A problem for the government in there expansion dreams. The other good thing is that the people like Americans. I have been invited into many homes to just talk and have tea. One nice story is that during a stay in a small city hotel (Xhilghot, Innermongolia) each night I would get a knock on the door and there would be three young people from the local school. They wanted to come in and practice their English. (Learning English is a big thing in China) It happened each night with different kids. My associate and I were then only Americans in town. I later learned that a schedule had been set up in their English class so that all could have a visit. After the second night after dinner I would just leave the hotel door open until after the visits. They want to know everything about America. ps, we want them to know.

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: apollonorthamerica
Sent: Mar 26, 2011 12:36 AM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

Ed,
Yes and so. There is nothing here that the Chinese if determined can't solve within less than a decade. Under-estimating a growing powerful economy while ours is stagnant would be a foolish mistake. The way US is headed right now in trade deficits and manufacturing, I fully expect us to be second class citizens in about 25 years next to China. I hope and wish this will be turned around but it won't happen just because Republicans want to cut spending 100 billion dollars. No one in the US power structure seem to take a serious goal oriented view to bring manufacturing back to the US and keep it here and make the playing field truly even. They all pay lip service to it. Its pathetic and US public falls for it over and over.

Very recently I got a solicitation from a Chinese "Group". One passage they presented in their plan was as follows:

<Quote>
"As already noted, the Group's analysis and research leads them to the view that a tricycle-style powered micro-light is the preferred aircraft type, at least in the context of the initial phase of the project.
They therefore wish to identify a foreign partner with rights to the design of an appropriate aircraft, prepared to enter the project with them. In brief the intention is that:
1. The Group will obtain rights to the aircraft design and manufacture in China.
2. They will work (as appropriate with the present owner of the design) to enhance the existing design, specifically from the perspective of materials used (carbon fibre, etc) and where possible, safety improvements (the latter in deference to the perceived Chinese "risk-averse" attitude to this activity)."

OWNER OF THE AIRCRAFT DESIGN
The Group seeks access to the design of a currently successful tricycle micro-light aircraft. The preference is that rights to the design in China would be assigned to the Group (or more realistically to the company when established). The design would be modified and enhanced as described above, before being put into production in China with the progressive roll out of the wider business model.
Within this general intent there are a number of variables that will need to be resolved, including short- and/or long-term benefits for the design owner. For example:
--- Opportunity for the original designer/design owner to be involved in the further development and modification of the aircraft.
--- Opportunity for the design owner to use the enhanced design in Australia.
--- Opportunity for the design owner to source new aircraft from the China manufacturing facility and import them to Australia (and potentially elsewhere) at a significantly reduced landed price than costs of manufacture in Australia.
--- In addition, the Group's hope is that the design owner will accept a share in the Company. The quantum of this will need to be resolved through negotiation, but perhaps of the order of around 3% of the value of the floated company.

<Un-Quote>

They had the usual cheaper labor, let us copy and enhance your design and then manufacture in China and you can buy from us, you will get ownership in our company etc. temptations but we are committed to making our flagship in the US and do not want to sell any design to Chinese in the way they proposed it. Thankfully I do not have to answer to shareholders and so on but only my own soul and conscience and my own dream, otherwise this answer would not have sat well.

I am telling you, they are opening their airspace and they are building the infra-structure for light to heavy GA ... everything. They want it fast tracked by buying up successful proven designs and technology. We should not under-estimate them. We need to do whatever we have to do to remain ahead. Its a war out there and US is still sleeping.

Abid

Ed Wrote:
The active word here is “potential”. What most here in the US do not know about is the total missing infrastructure in China to support GA or Sport aviation. It is so far off as not to be seen with the Hubble telescope. A few examples. All flights in China require a filled flight plan and are always in communication with ATC. All pilots in China must have a second class medical or better. All pilots must have a private license or better. You are looked down on without an instrument rating. There is no LL fuel. There are very few airports in all of China. Those that are there are set up for scheduled commercial flights or crop dusting. No FBO’s No hangars, No shades, No repair facilities, No mechanics, No parts, No flight schools (a few commercial schools) No instructor base, it is safe to say, no private pilots, a hand full. Only a few hundred GA aircraft in all of China. The only place you find any of what we take for granted is at the big international airports. There is no recreational aviation in China, no plans to get into it. The push is to expand the airport base and find ways and means to introduce the GA concept as we understand it. Many fear an “open sky policy”, a long way off, but it will come piecemeal to some degree, it is just going to take a very long time. We have it so good here.

I have been to China each year for the past three, have two small crop dusters there I was lucky enough to get in. I’m one of few around to have a Chinese pilots license, and proud to have it. Some day I will have to write the story about getting my medical there, a total riot, you would think I was going to be an astronaut.

Ed



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

Ed,
I am not sure I get the relevance here.
The initial solicitation given that I quoted from was not from any Dreamers looking for my money.
This was a group with Chinese provincial government support and ex-Chinese Airforce high ranking officers leading the project who obviously had enough money to hire a dedicated English speaking Australian consultancy company just to fetch out companies like ours for them and to take the temperature so to speak.

Chinese people liking Americans .. well sure and them wanting to learn English. Of course. Compared to India, Pakistan and others in the region Chinese are lagging far behind in this area so that is understandable. However, that has little effect on Chinese bsuiness and government enterprise.

You say stop buying from China and they will be set back 50 years. Well I grew up right next door to them and I think we Americans think a little bit too much of ourselves. We keep that up and the Asians will kick our arse out the window and we won't even know what hit us and they will do it while serving us with a smile.
Let me ask you, "Can WE stop buying from China or India or Malaysia or Indonesia completely, right now?"
I don't think so.
Abid


Ed Wrote:
Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

I have box full of these. . . Dreamers looking for your money.

China has many internal problems in every life sector you will never hear about. Stop buying Chinese and they go back half a century. The good news is that many in the big cities are now starting to make a little money that brings them some additional freedoms, the more they get, the more they want. A problem for the government in there expansion dreams. The other good thing is that the people like Americans. I have been invited into many homes to just talk and have tea. One nice story is that during a stay in a small city hotel (Xhilghot, Innermongolia) each night I would get a knock on the door and there would be three young people from the local school. They wanted to come in and practice their English. (Learning English is a big thing in China) It happened each night with different kids. My associate and I were then only Americans in town. I later learned that a schedule had been set up in their English class so that all could have a visit. After the second night after dinner I would just leave the hotel door open until after the visits. They want to know everything about America. ps, we want them to know.

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: apollonorthamerica
Sent: Mar 26, 2011 12:36 AM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

Ed,
Yes and so. There is nothing here that the Chinese if determined can't solve within less than a decade. Under-estimating a growing powerful economy while ours is stagnant would be a foolish mistake. The way US is headed right now in trade deficits and manufacturing, I fully expect us to be second class citizens in about 25 years next to China. I hope and wish this will be turned around but it won't happen just because Republicans want to cut spending 100 billion dollars. No one in the US power structure seem to take a serious goal oriented view to bring manufacturing back to the US and keep it here and make the playing field truly even. They all pay lip service to it. Its pathetic and US public falls for it over and over.

Very recently I got a solicitation from a Chinese "Group". One passage they presented in their plan was as follows:

<Quote>
"As already noted, the Group's analysis and research leads them to the view that a tricycle-style powered micro-light is the preferred aircraft type, at least in the context of the initial phase of the project.
They therefore wish to identify a foreign partner with rights to the design of an appropriate aircraft, prepared to enter the project with them. In brief the intention is that:
1. The Group will obtain rights to the aircraft design and manufacture in China.
2. They will work (as appropriate with the present owner of the design) to enhance the existing design, specifically from the perspective of materials used (carbon fibre, etc) and where possible, safety improvements (the latter in deference to the perceived Chinese "risk-averse" attitude to this activity)."

OWNER OF THE AIRCRAFT DESIGN
The Group seeks access to the design of a currently successful tricycle micro-light aircraft. The preference is that rights to the design in China would be assigned to the Group (or more realistically to the company when established). The design would be modified and enhanced as described above, before being put into production in China with the progressive roll out of the wider business model.
Within this general intent there are a number of variables that will need to be resolved, including short- and/or long-term benefits for the design owner. For example:
--- Opportunity for the original designer/design owner to be involved in the further development and modification of the aircraft.
--- Opportunity for the design owner to use the enhanced design in Australia.
--- Opportunity for the design owner to source new aircraft from the China manufacturing facility and import them to Australia (and potentially elsewhere) at a significantly reduced landed price than costs of manufacture in Australia.
--- In addition, the Group's hope is that the design owner will accept a share in the Company. The quantum of this will need to be resolved through negotiation, but perhaps of the order of around 3% of the value of the floated company.

<Un-Quote>

They had the usual cheaper labor, let us copy and enhance your design and then manufacture in China and you can buy from us, you will get ownership in our company etc. temptations but we are committed to making our flagship in the US and do not want to sell any design to Chinese in the way they proposed it. Thankfully I do not have to answer to shareholders and so on but only my own soul and conscience and my own dream, otherwise this answer would not have sat well.

I am telling you, they are opening their airspace and they are building the infra-structure for light to heavy GA ... everything. They want it fast tracked by buying up successful proven designs and technology. We should not under-estimate them. We need to do whatever we have to do to remain ahead. Its a war out there and US is still sleeping.

Abid

Ed Wrote:
The active word here is “potential”. What most here in the US do not know about is the total missing infrastructure in China to support GA or Sport aviation. It is so far off as not to be seen with the Hubble telescope. A few examples. All flights in China require a filled flight plan and are always in communication with ATC. All pilots in China must have a second class medical or better. All pilots must have a private license or better. You are looked down on without an instrument rating. There is no LL fuel. There are very few airports in all of China. Those that are there are set up for scheduled commercial flights or crop dusting. No FBO’s No hangars, No shades, No repair facilities, No mechanics, No parts, No flight schools (a few commercial schools) No instructor base, it is safe to say, no private pilots, a hand full. Only a few hundred GA aircraft in all of China. The only place you find any of what we take for granted is at the big international airports. There is no recreational aviation in China, no plans to get into it. The push is to expand the airport base and find ways and means to introduce the GA concept as we understand it. Many fear an “open sky policy”, a long way off, but it will come piecemeal to some degree, it is just going to take a very long time. We have it so good here.

I have been to China each year for the past three, have two small crop dusters there I was lucky enough to get in. I’m one of few around to have a Chinese pilots license, and proud to have it. Some day I will have to write the story about getting my medical there, a total riot, you would think I was going to be an astronaut.

Ed


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree



I have box full of these. . .  Dreamers looking for your money.

China has many internal problems in every life sector you will never hear about.  Stop buying Chinese and they go back half a century.  The good news is that many in the big cities are now starting to make a little money that brings them some additional freedoms, the more they get, the more they want.  A problem for the government in there expansion dreams.  The other good thing is that the people like Americans.  I have been invited into many homes to just talk and have tea.  One nice story is that during a stay in a small city hotel (Xhilghot, Innermongolia) each night I would get a knock on the door and there would be three young people from the local school.  They wanted to come in and practice their English.  (Learning English is a big thing in China) It happened each night with different kids.  My associate and I were then only Americans in town.  I later learned that a schedule had been set up in their English class so that all could have a visit.  After the second night after dinner I would just leave the hotel door open until after the visits.  They want to know everything about America.     ps, we want them to know.

Ed

 

-----Original Message-----
From: apollonorthamerica
Sent: Mar 26, 2011 12:36 AM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

 

Ed,
Yes and so. There is nothing here that the Chinese if determined can't solve within less than a decade. Under-estimating a growing powerful economy while ours is stagnant would be a foolish mistake. The way US is headed right now in trade deficits and manufacturing, I fully expect us to be second class citizens in about 25 years next to China. I hope and wish this will be turned around but it won't happen just because Republicans want to cut spending 100 billion dollars. No one in the US power structure seem to take a serious goal oriented view to bring manufacturing back to the US and keep it here and make the playing field truly even. They all pay lip service to it. Its pathetic and US public falls for it over and over.

Very recently I got a solicitation from a Chinese "Group". One passage they presented in their plan was as follows:

<Quote>
"As already noted, the Group's analysis and research leads them to the view that a tricycle-style powered micro-light is the preferred aircraft type, at least in the context of the initial phase of the project.
They therefore wish to identify a foreign partner with rights to the design of an appropriate aircraft, prepared to enter the project with them. In brief the intention is that:
1. The Group will obtain rights to the aircraft design and manufacture in China.
2. They will work (as appropriate with the present owner of the design) to enhance the existing design, specifically from the perspective of materials used (carbon fibre, etc) and where possible, safety improvements (the latter in deference to the perceived Chinese "risk-averse" attitude to this activity)."

OWNER OF THE AIRCRAFT DESIGN
The Group seeks access to the design of a currently successful tricycle micro-light aircraft. The preference is that rights to the design in China would be assigned to the Group (or more realistically to the company when established). The design would be modified and enhanced as described above, before being put into production in China with the progressive roll out of the wider business model.
Within this general intent there are a number of variables that will need to be resolved, including short- and/or long-term benefits for the design owner. For example:
--- Opportunity for the original designer/design owner to be involved in the further development and modification of the aircraft.
--- Opportunity for the design owner to use the enhanced design in Australia.
--- Opportunity for the design owner to source new aircraft from the China manufacturing facility and import them to Australia (and potentially elsewhere) at a significantly reduced landed price than costs of manufacture in Australia.
--- In addition, the Group's hope is that the design owner will accept a share in the Company. The quantum of this will need to be resolved through negotiation, but perhaps of the order of around 3% of the value of the floated company.

<Un-Quote>

They had the usual cheaper labor, let us copy and enhance your design and then manufacture in China and you can buy from us, you will get ownership in our company etc. temptations but we are committed to making our flagship in the US and do not want to sell any design to Chinese in the way they proposed it. Thankfully I do not have to answer to shareholders and so on but only my own soul and conscience and my own dream, otherwise this answer would not have sat well.

I am telling you, they are opening their airspace and they are building the infra-structure for light to heavy GA ... everything. They want it fast tracked by buying up successful proven designs and technology. We should not under-estimate them. We need to do whatever we have to do to remain ahead. Its a war out there and US is still sleeping.

Abid

Ed Wrote:
The active word here is “potential”. What most here in the US do not know about is the total missing infrastructure in China to support GA or Sport aviation. It is so far off as not to be seen with the Hubble telescope. A few examples. All flights in China require a filled flight plan and are always in communication with ATC. All pilots in China must have a second class medical or better. All pilots must have a private license or better. You are looked down on without an instrument rating. There is no LL fuel. There are very few airports in all of China. Those that are there are set up for scheduled commercial flights or crop dusting. No FBO’s No hangars, No shades, No repair facilities, No mechanics, No parts, No flight schools (a few commercial schools) No instructor base, it is safe to say, no private pilots, a hand full. Only a few hundred GA aircraft in all of China. The only place you find any of what we take for granted is at the big international airports. There is no recreational aviation in China, no plans to get into it. The push is to expand the airport base and find ways and means to introduce the GA concept as we understand it. Many fear an “open sky policy”, a long way off, but it will come piecemeal to some degree, it is just going to take a very long time. We have it so good here.

I have been to China each year for the past three, have two small crop dusters there I was lucky enough to get in. I’m one of few around to have a Chinese pilots license, and proud to have it. Some day I will have to write the story about getting my medical there, a total riot, you would think I was going to be an astronaut.

Ed



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Friday, March 25, 2011

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

I am not interested in anything with China right now except Chinese market opening up to American products and them respecting intellectual property.
Abid

--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, Peter Walker <peterwalker58@...> wrote:
>
> Hello
> f you are interested in the mechanics of a joint venture with China look at the VFT history with i think Siemens The supplied one order and had the technology copied That was with a State Owned Enterprise ( A Chinese government business) General Aviation wont be a big thing in China for much the same reasons as its dying in the West Chinese need a toy to be on view A plane unless its a G5 or similar wont be noticed The other killer is Chinese rarely have a sphere of business that extends outside a city or province The government "taxes" make it too hard to doPeter
> --- On Sat, 3/26/11, apollonorthamerica <apollonorthamerica@...> wrote:
>
> From: apollonorthamerica <apollonorthamerica@...>
> Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree
> To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, March 26, 2011, 3:43 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> And note the "Australia" reference.
>
> This is because they are also looking at Australian manufacturer of trikes (Airborne) and did not change the proposal when they sent it to me. Obviously someone will sell something to them quietly. I already know of a popular French trike design being made very quietly in China.
>
> Abid
>
>
>
> --- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, "apollonorthamerica" <apollonorthamerica@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Ed,
>
> > Yes and so. There is nothing here that the Chinese if determined can't solve within less than a decade. Under-estimating a growing powerful economy while ours is stagnant would be a foolish mistake. The way US is headed right now in trade deficits and manufacturing, I fully expect us to be second class citizens in about 25 years next to China. I hope and wish this will be turned around but it won't happen just because Republicans want to cut spending 100 billion dollars. No one in the US power structure seem to take a serious goal oriented view to bring manufacturing back to the US and keep it here and make the playing field truly even. They all pay lip service to it. Its pathetic and US public falls for it over and over.
>
> >
>
> > Very recently I got a solicitation from a Chinese "Group". One passage they presented in their plan was as follows:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > <Quote>
>
> > "As already noted, the Group's analysis and research leads them to the view that a tricycle-style powered micro-light is the preferred aircraft type, at least in the context of the initial phase of the project.
>
> > They therefore wish to identify a foreign partner with rights to the design of an appropriate aircraft, prepared to enter the project with them. In brief the intention is that:
>
> > 1. The Group will obtain rights to the aircraft design and manufacture in China.
>
> > 2. They will work (as appropriate with the present owner of the design) to enhance the existing design, specifically from the perspective of materials used (carbon fibre, etc) and where possible, safety improvements (the latter in deference to the perceived Chinese "risk-averse" attitude to this activity)."
>
> >
>
> > OWNER OF THE AIRCRAFT DESIGN
>
> > The Group seeks access to the design of a currently successful tricycle micro-light aircraft. The preference is that rights to the design in China would be assigned to the Group (or more realistically to the company when established). The design would be modified and enhanced as described above, before being put into production in China with the progressive roll out of the wider business model.
>
> > Within this general intent there are a number of variables that will need to be resolved, including short- and/or long-term benefits for the design owner. For example:
>
> > --- Opportunity for the original designer/design owner to be involved in the further development and modification of the aircraft.
>
> > --- Opportunity for the design owner to use the enhanced design in Australia.
>
> > --- Opportunity for the design owner to source new aircraft from the China manufacturing facility and import them to Australia (and potentially elsewhere) at a significantly reduced landed price than costs of manufacture in Australia.
>
> > --- In addition, the Group's hope is that the design owner will accept a share in the Company. The quantum of this will need to be resolved through negotiation, but perhaps of the order of around 3% of the value of the floated company.
>
> >
>
> > <Un-Quote>
>
> >
>
> > They had the usual cheaper labor, let us copy and enhance your design and then manufacture in China and you can buy from us, you will get ownership in our company etc. temptations but we are committed to making our flagship in the US and do not want to sell any design to Chinese in the way they proposed it. Thankfully I do not have to answer to shareholders and so on but only my own soul and conscience and my own dream, otherwise this answer would not have sat well.
>
> >
>
> > I am telling you, they are opening their airspace and they are building the infra-structure for light to heavy GA ... everything. They want it fast tracked by buying up successful proven designs and technology. We should not under-estimate them. We need to do whatever we have to do to remain ahead. Its a war out there and US is still sleeping.
>
> >
>
> > Abid
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Ed Wrote:
>
> > The active word here is “potential”. What most here in the US do not know about is the total missing infrastructure in China to support GA or Sport aviation. It is so far off as not to be seen with the Hubble telescope. A few examples. All flights in China require a filled flight plan and are always in communication with ATC. All pilots in China must have a second class medical or better. All pilots must have a private license or better. You are looked down on without an instrument rating. There is no LL fuel. There are very few airports in all of China. Those that are there are set up for scheduled commercial flights or crop dusting. No FBO’s No hangars, No shades, No repair facilities, No mechanics, No parts, No flight schools (a few commercial schools) No instructor base, it is safe to say, no private pilots, a hand full. Only a few hundred GA aircraft in all of China. The only place you find any of what we take for granted is
> at the big international airports. There is no recreational aviation in China, no plans to get into it. The push is to expand the airport base and find ways and means to introduce the GA concept as we understand it. Many fear an “open sky policy”, a long way off, but it will come piecemeal to some degree, it is just going to take a very long time. We have it so good here.
>
> >
>
> > I have been to China each year for the past three, have two small crop dusters there I was lucky enough to get in. I’m one of few around to have a Chinese pilots license, and proud to have it. Some day I will have to write the story about getting my medical there, a total riot, you would think I was going to be an astronaut.
>
> >
>
> > Ed
>
> >
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree



Hello

f you are interested in the mechanics of a joint venture with China look at the VFT history with i think Siemens The supplied one order and had the technology copied That was with a State Owned Enterprise ( A Chinese government business)
 General Aviation wont be a big thing in China for much the same reasons as its dying in the West
 Chinese need a toy to be on view A plane unless its a G5 or similar wont be noticed The other killer is Chinese rarely have a sphere of business that extends outside a city or province The government "taxes" make it too hard to do
Peter
--- On
Sat, 3/26/11, apollonorthamerica <apollonorthamerica@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: apollonorthamerica <apollonorthamerica@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, March 26, 2011, 3:43 PM

 

And note the "Australia" reference.
This is because they are also looking at Australian manufacturer of trikes (Airborne) and did not change the proposal when they sent it to me. Obviously someone will sell something to them quietly. I already know of a popular French trike design being made very quietly in China.
Abid

--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, "apollonorthamerica" <apollonorthamerica@...> wrote:
>
> Ed,
> Yes and so. There is nothing here that the Chinese if determined can't solve within less than a decade. Under-estimating a growing powerful economy while ours is stagnant would be a foolish mistake. The way US is headed right now in trade deficits and manufacturing, I fully expect us to be second class citizens in about 25 years next to China. I hope and wish this will be turned around but it won't happen just because Republicans want to cut spending 100 billion dollars. No one in the US power structure seem to take a serious goal oriented view to bring manufacturing back to the US and keep it here and make the playing field truly even. They all pay lip service to it. Its pathetic and US public falls for it over and over.
>
> Very recently I got a solicitation from a Chinese "Group". One passage they presented in their plan was as follows:
>
>
> <Quote>
> "As already noted, the Group's analysis and research leads them to the view that a tricycle-style powered micro-light is the preferred aircraft type, at least in the context of the initial phase of the project.
> They therefore wish to identify a foreign partner with rights to the design of an appropriate aircraft, prepared to enter the project with them. In brief the intention is that:
> 1. The Group will obtain rights to the aircraft design and manufacture in China.
> 2. They will work (as appropriate with the present owner of the design) to enhance the existing design, specifically from the perspective of materials used (carbon fibre, etc) and where possible, safety improvements (the latter in deference to the perceived Chinese "risk-averse" attitude to this activity)."
>
> OWNER OF THE AIRCRAFT DESIGN
> The Group seeks access to the design of a currently successful tricycle micro-light aircraft. The preference is that rights to the design in China would be assigned to the Group (or more realistically to the company when established). The design would be modified and enhanced as described above, before being put into production in China with the progressive roll out of the wider business model.
> Within this general intent there are a number of variables that will need to be resolved, including short- and/or long-term benefits for the design owner. For example:
> --- Opportunity for the original designer/design owner to be involved in the further development and modification of the aircraft.
> --- Opportunity for the design owner to use the enhanced design in Australia.
> --- Opportunity for the design owner to source new aircraft from the China manufacturing facility and import them to Australia (and potentially elsewhere) at a significantly reduced landed price than costs of manufacture in Australia.
> --- In addition, the Group's hope is that the design owner will accept a share in the Company. The quantum of this will need to be resolved through negotiation, but perhaps of the order of around 3% of the value of the floated company.
>
> <Un-Quote>
>
> They had the usual cheaper labor, let us copy and enhance your design and then manufacture in China and you can buy from us, you will get ownership in our company etc. temptations but we are committed to making our flagship in the US and do not want to sell any design to Chinese in the way they proposed it. Thankfully I do not have to answer to shareholders and so on but only my own soul and conscience and my own dream, otherwise this answer would not have sat well.
>
> I am telling you, they are opening their airspace and they are building the infra-structure for light to heavy GA ... everything. They want it fast tracked by buying up successful proven designs and technology. We should not under-estimate them. We need to do whatever we have to do to remain ahead. Its a war out there and US is still sleeping.
>
> Abid
>
>
>
> Ed Wrote:
> The active word here is "potential". What most here in the US do not know about is the total missing infrastructure in China to support GA or Sport aviation. It is so far off as not to be seen with the Hubble telescope. A few examples. All flights in China require a filled flight plan and are always in communication with ATC. All pilots in China must have a second class medical or better. All pilots must have a private license or better. You are looked down on without an instrument rating. There is no LL fuel. There are very few airports in all of China. Those that are there are set up for scheduled commercial flights or crop dusting. No FBO's No hangars, No shades, No repair facilities, No mechanics, No parts, No flight schools (a few commercial schools) No instructor base, it is safe to say, no private pilots, a hand full. Only a few hundred GA aircraft in all of China. The only place you find any of what we take for granted is at the big international airports. There is no recreational aviation in China, no plans to get into it. The push is to expand the airport base and find ways and means to introduce the GA concept as we understand it. Many fear an "open sky policy", a long way off, but it will come piecemeal to some degree, it is just going to take a very long time. We have it so good here.
>
> I have been to China each year for the past three, have two small crop dusters there I was lucky enough to get in. I'm one of few around to have a Chinese pilots license, and proud to have it. Some day I will have to write the story about getting my medical there, a total riot, you would think I was going to be an astronaut.
>
> Ed
>



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

And note the "Australia" reference.
This is because they are also looking at Australian manufacturer of trikes (Airborne) and did not change the proposal when they sent it to me. Obviously someone will sell something to them quietly. I already know of a popular French trike design being made very quietly in China.
Abid

--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, "apollonorthamerica" <apollonorthamerica@...> wrote:
>
> Ed,
> Yes and so. There is nothing here that the Chinese if determined can't solve within less than a decade. Under-estimating a growing powerful economy while ours is stagnant would be a foolish mistake. The way US is headed right now in trade deficits and manufacturing, I fully expect us to be second class citizens in about 25 years next to China. I hope and wish this will be turned around but it won't happen just because Republicans want to cut spending 100 billion dollars. No one in the US power structure seem to take a serious goal oriented view to bring manufacturing back to the US and keep it here and make the playing field truly even. They all pay lip service to it. Its pathetic and US public falls for it over and over.
>
> Very recently I got a solicitation from a Chinese "Group". One passage they presented in their plan was as follows:
>
>
> <Quote>
> "As already noted, the Group's analysis and research leads them to the view that a tricycle-style powered micro-light is the preferred aircraft type, at least in the context of the initial phase of the project.
> They therefore wish to identify a foreign partner with rights to the design of an appropriate aircraft, prepared to enter the project with them. In brief the intention is that:
> 1. The Group will obtain rights to the aircraft design and manufacture in China.
> 2. They will work (as appropriate with the present owner of the design) to enhance the existing design, specifically from the perspective of materials used (carbon fibre, etc) and where possible, safety improvements (the latter in deference to the perceived Chinese "risk-averse" attitude to this activity)."
>
> OWNER OF THE AIRCRAFT DESIGN
> The Group seeks access to the design of a currently successful tricycle micro-light aircraft. The preference is that rights to the design in China would be assigned to the Group (or more realistically to the company when established). The design would be modified and enhanced as described above, before being put into production in China with the progressive roll out of the wider business model.
> Within this general intent there are a number of variables that will need to be resolved, including short- and/or long-term benefits for the design owner. For example:
> --- Opportunity for the original designer/design owner to be involved in the further development and modification of the aircraft.
> --- Opportunity for the design owner to use the enhanced design in Australia.
> --- Opportunity for the design owner to source new aircraft from the China manufacturing facility and import them to Australia (and potentially elsewhere) at a significantly reduced landed price than costs of manufacture in Australia.
> --- In addition, the Group's hope is that the design owner will accept a share in the Company. The quantum of this will need to be resolved through negotiation, but perhaps of the order of around 3% of the value of the floated company.
>
> <Un-Quote>
>
> They had the usual cheaper labor, let us copy and enhance your design and then manufacture in China and you can buy from us, you will get ownership in our company etc. temptations but we are committed to making our flagship in the US and do not want to sell any design to Chinese in the way they proposed it. Thankfully I do not have to answer to shareholders and so on but only my own soul and conscience and my own dream, otherwise this answer would not have sat well.
>
> I am telling you, they are opening their airspace and they are building the infra-structure for light to heavy GA ... everything. They want it fast tracked by buying up successful proven designs and technology. We should not under-estimate them. We need to do whatever we have to do to remain ahead. Its a war out there and US is still sleeping.
>
> Abid
>
>
>
> Ed Wrote:
> The active word here is “potential”. What most here in the US do not know about is the total missing infrastructure in China to support GA or Sport aviation. It is so far off as not to be seen with the Hubble telescope. A few examples. All flights in China require a filled flight plan and are always in communication with ATC. All pilots in China must have a second class medical or better. All pilots must have a private license or better. You are looked down on without an instrument rating. There is no LL fuel. There are very few airports in all of China. Those that are there are set up for scheduled commercial flights or crop dusting. No FBO’s No hangars, No shades, No repair facilities, No mechanics, No parts, No flight schools (a few commercial schools) No instructor base, it is safe to say, no private pilots, a hand full. Only a few hundred GA aircraft in all of China. The only place you find any of what we take for granted is at the big international airports. There is no recreational aviation in China, no plans to get into it. The push is to expand the airport base and find ways and means to introduce the GA concept as we understand it. Many fear an “open sky policy”, a long way off, but it will come piecemeal to some degree, it is just going to take a very long time. We have it so good here.
>
> I have been to China each year for the past three, have two small crop dusters there I was lucky enough to get in. I’m one of few around to have a Chinese pilots license, and proud to have it. Some day I will have to write the story about getting my medical there, a total riot, you would think I was going to be an astronaut.
>
> Ed
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

That's starting to change
Abid

--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, medicbill@... wrote:
>
> Don't forget the airspace is controlled by the military and in many cases
> flights by GA aircraft force them down to under 100 AGL.
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 3/25/2011 6:23:29 A.M. Pacific Standard Time (Mex,
> pwrsport@... writes:
>
>
>
> The active word here is “potential”. What most here in the US do not
> know about is the total missing infrastructure in China to support GA or
> Sport aviation. It is so far off as not to be seen with the Hubble telescope.
> A few examples. All flights in China require a filled flight plan and are
> always in communication with ATC. All pilots in China must have a second
> class medical or better. All pilots must have a private license or better.
> You are looked down on without an instrument rating. There is no LL
> fuel. There are very few airports in all of China. Those that are there are
> set up for scheduled commercial flights or crop dusting. No FBO’s No
> hangars, No shades, No repair facilities, No mechanics, No parts, No flight
> schools (a few commercial schools) No instructor base, it is safe to say,
> no private pilots, a hand full. Only a few hundred GA aircraft in all of
> China. The only place you find any of what we take for granted is at the big
> international airports. There is no recreational aviation in China, no
> plans to get into it. The push is to expand the airport base and find ways
> and means to introduce the GA concept as we understand it. Many fear an “
> open sky policy”, a long way off, but it will come piecemeal to some degree,
> it is just going to take a very long time. We have it so good here.
> I have been to China each year for the past three, have two small crop
> dusters there I was lucky enough to get in. I’m one of few around to have a
> Chinese pilots license, and proud to have it. Some day I will have to
> write the story about getting my medical there, a total riot, you would think I
> was going to be an astronaut.
> Ed
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Helen Woods
> Sent: Mar 25, 2011 7:43 AM
> To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree
>
>
>
>
> Two things:
>
> 1. They recognize a good investment when they see one and US companies
> have often proven a good investment
>
> 2. The Chinese government is beginning to open up airspace over China
> for general aviation. Considering the growth wealth of the average
> Chinese citizen, the size of the country, and the geographic barriers to
> travel in China, GA has a huge potential for growth in China
>
> Helen
>
> On 3/24/2011 10:47 PM, apollonorthamerica wrote:
> > Seems like Chinese interests are buying up many big and small American
> aviation companies recently. What's up with that? I think they are looking
> at buying a trike design company as well and if they can't get it from the
> US, then from somewhere else.
> > Abid
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> <ZZZHE
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

Ed,
Yes and so. There is nothing here that the Chinese if determined can't solve within less than a decade. Under-estimating a growing powerful economy while ours is stagnant would be a foolish mistake. The way US is headed right now in trade deficits and manufacturing, I fully expect us to be second class citizens in about 25 years next to China. I hope and wish this will be turned around but it won't happen just because Republicans want to cut spending 100 billion dollars. No one in the US power structure seem to take a serious goal oriented view to bring manufacturing back to the US and keep it here and make the playing field truly even. They all pay lip service to it. Its pathetic and US public falls for it over and over.

Very recently I got a solicitation from a Chinese "Group". One passage they presented in their plan was as follows:


<Quote>
"As already noted, the Group's analysis and research leads them to the view that a tricycle-style powered micro-light is the preferred aircraft type, at least in the context of the initial phase of the project.
They therefore wish to identify a foreign partner with rights to the design of an appropriate aircraft, prepared to enter the project with them. In brief the intention is that:
1. The Group will obtain rights to the aircraft design and manufacture in China.
2. They will work (as appropriate with the present owner of the design) to enhance the existing design, specifically from the perspective of materials used (carbon fibre, etc) and where possible, safety improvements (the latter in deference to the perceived Chinese "risk-averse" attitude to this activity)."

OWNER OF THE AIRCRAFT DESIGN
The Group seeks access to the design of a currently successful tricycle micro-light aircraft. The preference is that rights to the design in China would be assigned to the Group (or more realistically to the company when established). The design would be modified and enhanced as described above, before being put into production in China with the progressive roll out of the wider business model.
Within this general intent there are a number of variables that will need to be resolved, including short- and/or long-term benefits for the design owner. For example:
--- Opportunity for the original designer/design owner to be involved in the further development and modification of the aircraft.
--- Opportunity for the design owner to use the enhanced design in Australia.
--- Opportunity for the design owner to source new aircraft from the China manufacturing facility and import them to Australia (and potentially elsewhere) at a significantly reduced landed price than costs of manufacture in Australia.
--- In addition, the Group's hope is that the design owner will accept a share in the Company. The quantum of this will need to be resolved through negotiation, but perhaps of the order of around 3% of the value of the floated company.

<Un-Quote>

They had the usual cheaper labor, let us copy and enhance your design and then manufacture in China and you can buy from us, you will get ownership in our company etc. temptations but we are committed to making our flagship in the US and do not want to sell any design to Chinese in the way they proposed it. Thankfully I do not have to answer to shareholders and so on but only my own soul and conscience and my own dream, otherwise this answer would not have sat well.

I am telling you, they are opening their airspace and they are building the infra-structure for light to heavy GA ... everything. They want it fast tracked by buying up successful proven designs and technology. We should not under-estimate them. We need to do whatever we have to do to remain ahead. Its a war out there and US is still sleeping.

Abid

Ed Wrote:
The active word here is “potential”. What most here in the US do not know about is the total missing infrastructure in China to support GA or Sport aviation. It is so far off as not to be seen with the Hubble telescope. A few examples. All flights in China require a filled flight plan and are always in communication with ATC. All pilots in China must have a second class medical or better. All pilots must have a private license or better. You are looked down on without an instrument rating. There is no LL fuel. There are very few airports in all of China. Those that are there are set up for scheduled commercial flights or crop dusting. No FBO’s No hangars, No shades, No repair facilities, No mechanics, No parts, No flight schools (a few commercial schools) No instructor base, it is safe to say, no private pilots, a hand full. Only a few hundred GA aircraft in all of China. The only place you find any of what we take for granted is at the big international airports. There is no recreational aviation in China, no plans to get into it. The push is to expand the airport base and find ways and means to introduce the GA concept as we understand it. Many fear an “open sky policy”, a long way off, but it will come piecemeal to some degree, it is just going to take a very long time. We have it so good here.

I have been to China each year for the past three, have two small crop dusters there I was lucky enough to get in. I’m one of few around to have a Chinese pilots license, and proud to have it. Some day I will have to write the story about getting my medical there, a total riot, you would think I was going to be an astronaut.

Ed

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Fw: our own worst enemy



Subject: our own worst enemy

    I have resently been working on some ultralight training issues and have come to the conclusion
 that  ultralighters have alot more control over the image of ultralight flying than they give themselvs credit for. after talking to several UL pilots i realized that if they were talking to a person wanting to get into flying ULs they probably would have changed ther mind with the bleek outlook that was demonstrated.
  in resent years we have been hit hard But if we want the industry to  improve we must start with our own perspective.   we all love to fly  i think we should encourage everyone that wants to learn to fly to do so, make it part of the challange.  dont make it sound like an impossible task.       
 You aren't defeated until you quit trying.

I will be at Sun N Fun at the Ultralight Headquarters tent all next week.  If you would like to talk about this issue or anything else involved in flying, give me a call.  We can meet up.

 

Malcolm Brubaker
Michigan Sport
Pilot Repair
LSRM-A, PPC, WS
(989)513-3022





__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree



Don't forget the airspace is controlled by the military and in many cases flights by GA aircraft force them down to under 100 AGL.
 
 
 
In a message dated 3/25/2011 6:23:29 A.M. Pacific Standard Time (Mex, pwrsport@ix.netcom.com writes:


The active word here is "potential".  What most here in the US do not know about is the total missing infrastructure in China to support GA or Sport aviation.  It is so far off as not to be seen with the Hubble telescope.  A few examples.  All flights in China require a filled flight plan and are always in communication with ATC.  All pilots in China must have a second class medical or better.  All pilots must have a private license or better.  You are looked down on without an instrument rating.  There is no LL fuel.  There are very few airports in all of China.  Those that are there are set up for scheduled commercial flights or crop dusting.   No FBO's  No hangars, No shades, No repair facilities, No mechanics, No parts, No flight schools (a few commercial schools)  No instructor base, it is safe to say, no private pilots, a hand full.  Only a few hundred GA aircraft in all of China.  The only place you find any of what we take for granted is at the big international airports.  There is no recreational aviation in China, no plans to get into it.  The push is to expand the airport base and find ways and means to introduce the GA concept as we understand it.  Many fear an "open sky policy", a long way off, but it will come piecemeal to some degree, it is just going to take a very long time.  We have it so good here. 

I have been to China each year for the past three, have two small crop dusters there I was lucky enough to get in.  I'm one of few around to have a Chinese pilots license, and proud to have it.  Some day I will have to write the story about getting my medical there, a total riot, you would think I was going to be an astronaut.   

Ed

 

 


-----Original Message-----
From: Helen Woods
Sent: Mar 25, 2011 7:43 AM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Chinese Buying spree

 

Two things:

1. They recognize a good investment when they see one and US companies
have often proven a good investment

2. The Chinese government is beginning to open up airspace over China
for general aviation. Considering the growth wealth of the average
Chinese citizen, the size of the country, and the geographic barriers to
travel in China, GA has a huge potential for growth in China

Helen

On 3/24/2011 10:47 PM, apollonorthamerica wrote:
> Seems like Chinese interests are buying up many big and small American aviation companies recently. What's up with that? I think they are looking at buying a trike design company as well and if they can't get it from the US, then from somewhere else.
> Abid
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___