Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: IFR Training and IFR Rating for Spor...

Cirrus is the Perfect plane for a Rich Guy.

It has killed MANY new owners who had more Dollars than Sense.

If they had taken some of that money and practiced actual flying instead of the Band-aid of a Chute...they would have been Much Safer than the "safety" they mistakenly thought they had purchased with the BRS.

The example in Manhattan when baseball player with "instructor" on board crashed Cirrus into building.
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2006/10/11/cirrus-sr20-crash-in-manhattan/

Barnaby


--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, medicbill@... wrote:
>
> Yes there is a big flaw with the Cirrus. If you get one on a spin you can
> not recover. That is why all Cirrus Aircraft come standard with a BRS.
>
>
> In a message dated 12/29/2010 7:45:11 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> averys_98550@... writes:
>
> I sometimes wonder if having that handle to pull like a reset button
> doesn't often times embolden pilots to go where a prudent pilot wouldn't dare to
> go. Cirus came out with the parachute and then started immediately show
> casing all the saves from their BRS. I have since wondered if there was a
> fundamental flaw in the aircraft, or an unwarranted feeling of invincibility
> by the operators who felt extra safe pushing the envelope because of that
> reset handle up on the bulkhead.
>
> Personally I'd rather have the baggage allowance.
>
> --- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, "wj18001900" <swferris@> wrote:
> >
> > Helen,
> >
> > Good point. That's one safety advantage LSA has over most of GA
> aircraft.
> >
> > Which leads me to another question for you (and for the other folks on
> this site as well) . . . while some people feel the BRS chutes are a total
> waste of time and money (they also add weight / take away from the useable
> load of an aircraft, and they take up a lot of space), other people feel the
> BRS chutes are the best aircraft safety device ever created, and that
> every aircraft should have one. . . . . And now on to my question: since many
> LSA aircraft have a very limited useful load, and many of them are short on
> space . . . since LSA aircraft can put down safely just about anywhere, do
> you feel that in most cases it would be wise not to have BRS chutes
> installed in LSA aircraft?
> >
> > Steve

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments:

Post a Comment