Personally I'd rather have the baggage allowance.
--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, "wj18001900" <swferris@...> wrote:
>
> Helen,
>
> Good point. That's one safety advantage LSA has over most of GA aircraft.
>
> Which leads me to another question for you (and for the other folks on this site as well) . . . while some people feel the BRS chutes are a total waste of time and money (they also add weight / take away from the useable load of an aircraft, and they take up a lot of space), other people feel the BRS chutes are the best aircraft safety device ever created, and that every aircraft should have one. . . . . And now on to my question: since many LSA aircraft have a very limited useful load, and many of them are short on space . . . since LSA aircraft can put down safely just about anywhere, do you feel that in most cases it would be wise not to have BRS chutes installed in LSA aircraft?
>
> Steve
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment