Sunday, November 13, 2011

RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group NEW Composite fully equipped LSA trainer from Pipistrel for just $85K



Have to disagree with you on fuel burn for touch and goes compared to cruise.  I've just not seen that to be the case.

 

From: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Williams
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 7:50 PM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group NEW Composite fully equipped LSA trainer from Pipistrel for just $85K

 

 

Michael,

Sorry, that is not correct.
The max payload is 490 pounds.
usable fuel, drain-able oil, luggage, and the humans are all part of that payload.

The fuel load, ~144 pounds for 24 gallons, leaves 346 pounds.
assuming the oil in the engine is 8pounds, leaves 338 pounds.
Just about enough for 2 FAA standard' weight persons.

Well, most American men weight are well above that 'FAA standard'.

The documentation does say that as much as 50 pounds can be put in the
storage//luggage compartment.
But we cannot afford the extra weight.

So, lets say the instructor weights 200 pounds.
that leaves 146 pounds for the student.
(assuming they can both crowd into the cockpit, it would be a real cosy fit.)
Hummmm......
I guess a cute little lady could qualify as the student without overloading the
plane.

There seems to be only one possible conclusion:
the skycatcher is engineered to make flying more accessible for the female
population.

The documentation I read did not mention the seat load limit, but the ASTM
required min value is 225pounds.

If my 300pounds were to be training in the skycatcher and the seat did not
collapse, the instructor would have to stay on the ground.

the documentation says a full tank will last a bit less than 4 hours.
If the fuel has to be reduced to accommodate the pilot/instructor, say by half,
then training time will be ~1.5 hours+plus reserve.

Touch-n-go practice will eat the fuel at a much higher rate than cruise
consumption of 6gal./hr.

I agree with Helen,
Training plane for solo training.

R. Williams

---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Michael Coates" <mcoates@mcp.com.au>
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:45:08 -0000
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group NEW Composite fully equipped LSA
trainer from Pipistrel for just $85K

> Hello Helen, when the aircraft has FULL Fuel there is a leftover
> payload for pilot and passenger of 460 pounds, you have got to be a
> pretty fat instructor if this is a concern.
> Also its important to note that the aircraft is designed for the full
> 600 Kg (1320 lbs) payload limit for the LSA category and is registered
> at this maximum takeoff weight in a large number of countries that
> accept the LSA category but do not have the restrictions that are in
> place in the USA market.
> The maximum takeoff weight of the aircraft is reduced slightly in the
> US market so it can meet the stall requirements with zero flap. So the
> aircraft is capable of another 100 pounds payload in other markets
> around the world but it is restricted in the USA. You have got to
> agree with me however that 460 pounds payload is more than adequate
> when the aircraft is carrying full fuel. I would be interested in
> seeing comparisons with other aircraft because I know they don't carry
> any more.....
>
> --- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, Helen Woods <Helen_Woods@...>
> wrote:>> Any plans to up the gross weight an hence the useful load?
> Right now its > yet another offering of a "solo trainer".> > Helen>
------- End of Original Message -------



__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment