Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: How about a WAY off-topic discussion...



I think its just pie in the sky anyway.I don't see how they can really believe that, but they need some kind of incentive.
Jim


From: Lyle Cox <LyleCox@funaerosports.com>
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, December 29, 2009 1:57:09 PM
Subject: RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: How about a WAY off-topic discussion...

 

72 virgins????? ??????  Give me 50 virgins and 22  that know what they are doing!

 

From: Sport_Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:Sport_ Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of James Ferris
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:54 AM
To: Sport_Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: How about a WAY off-topic discussion.. .

 

 

You have to believe!!!!! you forgot about the 72 virgins diden't you.

Jim

 


From: brianmacgeek <brian@garrett. net>
To: Sport_Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, December 29, 2009 12:27:36 PM
Subject: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: How about a WAY off-topic discussion.. .

 

I think someone who tries to kill themselves for a cause by definition is someone who isn't very smart... :)

Brian

--- In Sport_Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com, medicbill@.. . wrote:
>
> Well opening the door at 30k might have destroyed the aircraft and killed
> everyone better then the so called bomb he was wearing. It comes down to
> this. This guy was not very smart. It was not well planned out and it simply
> did not work.
>
>
> In a message dated 12/28/2009 11:06:03 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> daleandee@.. . writes:
>
>
>
> The answer is not anything that can be done on the airplane after
> take-off. If he would have stayed in the toilet he might have been
> successful.
>
> Security of flight must happen at the airport before take-off. But I
> guess now that some nut-job had explosives tied to his underwear that
> we will all be required to take ours off so they can have a look-see
> at it. Mom always said to wear clean undies.
>
> My suggestion would have been to put the fire out, take him to the
> rear door, set him on fire again, and push his radical, gee-hawd
> behind into the open sky at about 30,000 feet without a chute.
>
> Sounds cruel? So does plotting to kill over 200 passengers ...
>
> Dale
>
> --- In Sport_Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com, "brianmacgeek" <brian@> wrote:
>
> > Is it just me, or do the new restrictions being placed on commercial
> > travel resulting from the latest stupid-person trying to set himself
> > on fire over Christmas just as silly of a reaction to the problem?
> > I mean really....? <SNIP>
>
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>

 




__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment