All,
I tried to get into the demo model.
It was not nearly big enough.
When I put one leg in first, then the other leg, the result was
I was hanging out the door and the top of the door was below my arm pit.
There was no way to get all of me into the cabin.
I might have put my rear into the door instead,
Then used the Sky crapper accordingly, but I felt there were too many people around for my sense of privacy.
R. Williams
---------- Original Message -----------
From: "jimmyg51147" <james-galvin@sbcglobal.net>
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:24:39 -0000
Subject: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Skycatcher news
>
>
> Hi Rick:
> Actually it is a Skycrapper. Cessna had a blank sheet of paper. They could have designed anything. Instaed they came up with an underpowered, overweight, shrunked up 150. And although it may seem derogatory to call it a "Skycraper" it is a much more acurate description.
> Jimmy
>
> --- In Sport_Aircraft@
> >
> >
> > Gary, that's the Cessna Sky*Catcher*
> > You keep calling it something else, I don't know if you're trying to be funny, cute, or what.... but it's not a skyscraper.
> > Knowingly using the wrong name is being derogatory..
> > Otherwise people will start talking about your Rot-Axe engines and Euro-fux. ;)
> >
> > Rick
> > Avid Flyer builder (predecessor to the Euro-Fux)
> >
>
>
------- End of Original Message -------
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment