I just Googled "CG aircraft". Came right up at the top.
I hope readers know to put aircraft in the search.
Abid
--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, LacyTG@... wrote:
>
> Again Jim, let me say this.............. I am talking about postings.
> Writings that someone writes for others to read and to understand. What ever
> the subject, there is a right way and a wrong way to put it down. As you
> wrote in this posting ATC (Air Traffic Control) spells out what you intend
> to talk about in your posting. So in all your following text, when you use
> the acronym ATC, the reader is aware of your meaning. That's how it is
> done in Government work but not here. All the writers, in this group do use
> the acronym without defining it, and lets the reader draw their own
> conclusion. That in my opinion is wrong.......... As I said, it is putting a gap
> between yourself and someone with lesser knowledge. And In one of the
> answers it was stated that you wanted to separate yourselves from mortal
> man............ wow, what a statement to say. I am using the posts I read here
> to take to local fly-ins and see what those pilots think about this
> attitude. I am sure they will not agree with anything here........... and they
> are also life long pilots........... same family. But, we'll see, and if I
> am wrong, I'll apologize at that time. So I wish to thank you and
> everyone for all for your inputs.......
>
> Lacy
>
>
>
> In a message dated 8/10/2011 10:52:07 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> jimbair@... writes:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I think we are on two separate subjects. I got the impression that the
> reader was a new pilot who didn’t want people throwing out terms like CG but
> wanted the writer to instead write Center of Gravity just in case there was
> a new person lurking who doesn’t know what CG is.
>
> Proper radio terminology is a different topic. Acronyms are not typically
> used in radio transmissions with ATC (Air Traffic Control). The wording
> used may seem a bot foreign to a new person, but usually entire words are
> used, they aren’t shortened. The brevity comes from using them in a concise
> manner that both the controller and the pilot expects to hear and reduces
> radio clutter.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
> From: _James Ferris_ (mailto:mijniljj@...)
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:41 AM
> To: _Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com_
> (mailto:Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com)
> Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Rod Machado's new Sport
> Pilot book i...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Learn the ACRONYMS, you need them when you spesk on the radio to the tower
> and aircraft control on IFR flights.
>
>
>
>
> From: "LacyTG@..." <LacyTG@...>
> To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2011 9:58 PM
> Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Rod Machado's new Sport
> Pilot book i...
>
>
>
>
> I guess, I want to maybe say thing that is going to make some people very
> mad at me, but I just have to say it none the less.
>
> It is my opinion that people in all of these groups use acronyms as if
> every one understand their terms. I worked for the government all of my life,
> who is known for this type of BS, however, when they use it in any types
> of writings they spell it out in all of their published works at least once.
> That is so anyone who reads it knows how it is used. In these types of
> groups, you ignore the lai person, as if your way above the common people.
> What in the world is wrong with open discussion and letting everyone
> "understand" your full meaning? I am new to the LSA organization, and wish to
> learn more. But am hampered by this type of conversation where I am slowed
> down by trying to figure out the words. Come on people, you can do better
> than that.
>
> You know we get upset at people who text on their phones all day long.
> The do not know how to write a word in English............ are you heading
> down that road leading the next generation?
>
> Just my person thought, take it or leave it, but I know there is others
> out there who feel the same way...........
>
> Lacy Kaye
> Owner: Challenger II in Spring Hill Florida........
>
>
>
> In a message dated 8/9/2011 9:18:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> drice003@... writes:
>
>
> I did rod's book ,while it is thick and it is massive ,there is nothing in
> there that is not worth knowing. I got a 96 on sp test and would not have
> done it with out the book
>
> and mine is now for sale with free notes in the margin
> d:
>
>
>
> Having to plow through 582 pages just to get a Sport Pilot license is way
> too much. I thought the appeal of getting a SP license was the training was
> much less than a PP. I read his equally massive Private Pilot Handbook and
> thought no wonder the drop out rate for PPs is nearly 70 % ( per AOPA ).
> While I like Rods writing style his books are a perfect example of less is
> ALOT more. The video courses I've seen from King are IMO a much easier and
> efficient way of learning than reading a bloated textbook.
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - _www.avg.com_ (http://www.avg.com/)
> Version: 9.0.901 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3822 - Release Date: 08/08/11
> 14:35:00
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment