Thursday, September 2, 2010

Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Video: FAA resolves Kings issue - AOPA

1) Me think thou dost protest too much. What a little too close to home?
2) You got a list of all the out of date databases handy?
3) Answered well by another poster
4)Oh! for crying out loud! 98% of people aren't pulling pilots and their wives out of aircraft with guns drawn.


--- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, medicbill@... wrote:
>
> I. Your doughnut comment just shows your continuing ignorance.
> 2, Expect them to do their damn jobs so it does not happen.
> 3, Not rocket science.
> 4. I would bet that 98% of people think that airplanes have VIN numbers
> just like cars.
>
>
> In a message dated 9/2/2010 3:33:37 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> james-galvin@... writes:
>
>
> Your logic is flawed in so many ways that I don't have time to detail all
> of them. Here are some:
> 1) "It is not their job to verify information given to them from a federal
> agency." It IS their job. And sooner or later it has to be done. Here they
> chose to verify it after committing all the resources detailed in the
> report and detaining the Kings. Had they done the verification prior to
> starting out the police could have spent the time eating their favorite doughnuts.
>
> 2)"The fault lies with the FAA and other agencies and possibly Cessna who
> knew this N number had a problem and should have made sure it had been
> changed." You expect Cessna or for that matter you or I to check EVERY data
> base (past, present, and particularly the obsolete ones) to make sure the
> N-number we are using is free and clear in each database. Please explain how we
> are to accomplish is task and rectify any discrepancies.
> 3) "I think that the FAA also should not reissue numbers from a stolen
> aircraft in such a short period of time or maybe never reissue them so
> something like this could not happen again." I don't even know where to start with
> this one!
> 4) "They acted they way they have been trained and the department policy."
> And you thought this was appropriate. This was hilarious. KEYSTONE COPS
> comes to mind. I got a kick out of them asking John King where the VIN number
> was located on the plane.
>
>
>
> --- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, medicbill@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > I believe the police acted appropriately based upon the information they
> recieved. It is not their job to verify information given to them from a
> federal agency. The fault lies with the FAA and other agencies and possibly
> Cessna who knew this N number had a problem and should have made sure it
> had been changed. Especially since it had happened before. Has this plane
> flown since the last time it I think that the FAA also should not reissue
> numbers from a stolen aircraft in such a short period of time or maybe never
> reissue them so something like this could not happen again.
> >
> > If it had not involved a high profile couple it would not even been
> found on the back page of the arts section. The police were given a report of a
> stolen aircraft from a government agency. The police have to depend on the
> reliability of that report and act upon it appropriately. Which is exactly
> what they did. In todays world after 911 how can they act any other way.
> >
> > As far as how they handled the situation after the Kings landing to the
> police they were conducting a felony stop. No different then they would if
> it was a stolen vehicle. They had no idea who was in that plane. They
> acted they way they have been trained and the department policy. To do it any
> other way is how police officers end up dead.
> >
> > The fault lays with the FAA and the government agencies who handle the
> registrations and the databases that the information comes from not the
> police who are doing their jobs. The Kings were only detained and not arrested.
> Once the info was cleared up they were released. Can it be stressful? Yes.
> I met the Kings at Oshkosh and even though they may be getting up in years
> they both appeared to me to be tough people and I am sure they handled it
> very well. Obviously they figured out a training angle from the situation
> just like you would expect they would.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments:

Post a Comment