----- Original Message -----From: Jay MaynardSent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:48 AMSubject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Apollo North American notat fault in Fatal inflight breakup!On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 03:19:53PM -0000, apollonorthamerica wrote:
> And that is a ridiculous assumption (that I am throwing rocks at other
> manufacturers). The manufacturer threw the rock out along with the FAA. No
> one had to throw anything more. If you consider anything here throwing
> rocks (ridiculous to think that in my book).
You did seem to take great pleasure in pointing out the Zodiac's
misfortunes. As I said, you're in no position to throw rocks, and that's
exactly what it looks like you did from here.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC, PP-ASEL, CFI-SP http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal. http://www.tronguy.com net
Fairmont, MN (KFRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC http://www.tronguy.net/N55ZC. shtml
__._,_.___
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Apollo North American notat fault in Fatal inflight breakup!
Jay: I'm curious about the mods being mandated. Is a person allowed to fly their plane back to the factory to get the mods done or do they have to get them done locally? Do you know yet who pays for the work? I still haven't read a clear explanation of what is causing the in-flight break-ups. Is it aileron "flutter" or are people just pulling the wings off doing stupidly high G maneuvers?
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment