very funny jim,u go man. Im new to this group and your the first message i looked at. way to !
From: James Ferris <mijniljj@yahoo.com>
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, November 5, 2009 5:29:20 PM
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Skycatcher news
One of the bigest problems we have today is the 50 years of shipping all the jobs overseas. The skycraper parts are all made in china and now they have moved a China company over here to assemble them in Kansas. As far as I am concrend Cessna can stick there cesspool airplane up their butt.
Jim
From: Gary Orpe <garyo@bak.rr. com>
To: Sport_Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thu, November 5, 2009 3:30:04 PM
Subject: RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Skycatcher news
Are the new Skyscrapers going to now make lawn darts out of the SLSA imports like the SP plan did to the UL business?
Gary O.
N181RL
661 746-4780 (FAX)
N181RL
661 746-4780 (FAX)
-----Original Message-----
From: Sport_Aircraft@ yahoogroups.. com [mailto:Sport_ Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Gary Orpe
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 12:24 PM
To: Sport_Aircraft@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Skycatcher news
Seemed before the convention AOPA, of which I am a member, wanted little to do with Sport Pilot and the craft that qualified. Now the new 162 is out with their complete support inferring that only the wings were made in China. Looks like Cessna has done everything just right and might just collapse the foreign market here with the 162 offering. Hard to beat partial glass cockpit and style, Continental engine and not made out of plastic or aluminum tubes and fabric like Ultralights. At a price lower than the competition at $111,000.How do you think this will turn out? Very interesting I would think.Gary O.
N181RL
661 746-4780 (FAX)
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment