I think you are correct concerning the earlier AOPA petition and, if my memory serves me correct (and I am sure someone could check) the FAA's position for declining the rule change, at that time, was that there was insufficient data to support the case for medical self certification for PPL. Now, since 2004 and the Light Sport Rule and the thousands of logged flight hours, the data now demonstrates that a third class medical makes no difference in reducing the number of accidents caused by pilot incapacitation when compared to medical self certification Sport Pilots are entitled to use.
Also, as you mentioned, the FAA's own medical flight surgeons are questioning the efficacy of third class medicals. Given the current climate to cut costs in Washington there maybe more traction than we may be aware. I can only guess at the costs in millions it takes to manage and administer the 3rd class medical process. Weighing those costs against no discernible benefit to air safety doesn't make a whole lot of sense. However, like all of us, I am extremely skeptical that rational thinking (or people with a whole lot of sense) are employed at the FAA. To get this done would take courage and leadership. So what are the chances of getting this done? Probably next to zero.
Kevin.
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment