RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Sport Pilot / Private Pilot

You are right,(12.500) but from financial and safety point of view it is great idea. For $25,000 we may have good trainer with good engine and good reputation. Insurance will be lot cheaper and we will support local economy.

Bogdan

 

---

From: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Bair
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:16 AM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Sport Pilot / Private Pilot

 

 

12,500#.  (Then you need an ATP.)

 

haha.  But seriously, your point is spot on.  I don't care what number is chosen, someone always has an example that should be included and it's only a couple of pounds more.

 

Jim

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Bob Comperini

To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:58 PM

Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Sport Pilot / Private Pilot

 

 

>Well, I apologize. I took your statement out of context. I agree SP is fine the way it is. I just hope that
>down the road a bit the FAA could up the weight a few pounds to include planes like the Cessna 150.

For what its worth, the FAA originally proposed 1,232 lbs for LSAs. the FAA in their final rule raised the limit to the current 1,320 we have now. They had to draw the line somewhere. If you increase the weight to C-152 limits, guaranteed, someone will be out there asking for "just a little more weight" for another model of a plane, that is "just a little" over the 152 limits. Where would it end?

--
Bob Comperini
e-mail: bob@fly-ul.com
WWW: http://www.fly-ul.com

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___