Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Cessna SkyCatcher completes ASTM complia...

Continental owns Cessna, hence the real reason they didn't build a plane
with a "useful" useful load via a Rotax 912 and hence the reason you
won't see a Lycoming on it either.

Helen

dan01020304 wrote:
> In addition to the Skycatcher's "is it finally fixed / can we really trust it now" spin issue is whether they will be offering Lycoming's soon to be certified IO-233 LSA engine in it. By the time Cessna finally offers the Skycatcher for sale ( late 2009 ) it won't be that much longer that the Lycoming engine becomes certified ( per Lycoming 1st Quarter of 2010 ).
>
> It would look awfully hypocritical of Lycoming to be pushing other LSA manufacturers to buy their LSA engine while their own sister company Cessna only offers a competitors engine, the Continental O-200 in the Skycatcher. Does this mean the first couple of months production of Skycatchers will have Continentals and then post 1st quarter 2010 the rest will have Lycomings ?
>
> At best it looks to be an example of poor timing and planning on Cessna's part.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/