don't have enough useful load for the required back up equipment and
systems. My guess is that's a large part of the reason the plane is
only available glass as well since steam gauges generally weigh more.
Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think TSOd equipment is
required for IFR in an LSA, just the manufacturers permission for use as
such.
Helen
Jay Maynard wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:43:37PM -0000, Abid Farooqui wrote:
>
> I, too, am a bit surprised that Cessna went with an O-200 rather than an
> IO-233-LSA. There's no real reason for the Skycatcher to go with a
> certificated engine, since they're not going to make it IFR capable (an
> error, IMAO, since it'd take little additional work - primarily getting
> Garmin to get the G300 TSOd). I can certainly understand why they wouldn't
> use a Rotax, OTOH.
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Sport_Aircraft-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Sport_Aircraft-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment