Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Inexpensive (relatively speaking) LSA Aircraft Options

Hello Its called a Jetstream Peter --- On Tue, 8/24/10, James Ferris <mijniljj@yahoo.com> wrote: From: James Ferris <mijniljj@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Inexpensive (relatively speaking) LSA Aircraft Options To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, August 24, 2010, 12:15 AM   A lot of guys would like to get a piece of that tailwind. From: Chris Norman <chris@digitalrealitycorp.com> To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, August 23, 2010 2:23:16 AM Subject: RE: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Inexpensive (relatively speaking) LSA Aircraft Options   I see how you are claiming that is in limits…   sea level calibrated airspeed in level flight with maximum continuous power and never-exceed speed must be 120 knots.   I am shocked they did not use IAS at standard temperature and pressure. Obviously ground speed is irrelevant, you could have a ground speed of 300 mph with a stiff tailwind or negative trying to go the opposite direction.   Seems the rules were changed recently to be more broad.   Chris Norman, CEO Digital Reality, Inc. 5118 Moss Garden Lane Katy, TX 77494   512.297.5450 Mobile Direct 281-385-9727 Office www.digitalrealitycorp.com     From: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kevin OD Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 12:55 AM To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com Subject: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Inexpensive (relatively speaking) LSA Aircraft Options     Hi Chris True enough that's 120kts maximum at sea level with the Jab 3300. On the Sonex web site they quite 170 MPH @ 8000 feet (approx 148kts) which is allowable under the LSA rules. Not bad for an LSA for about $37K, plus it's Aerobatic. Kevin --- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Norman" <chris@...> wrote: > > Why does goes like stink seem out of line for Light Sport? You're limited to > 120 Knots maximum level flight. That's not fast to me.My Piper goes faster > than that! > > > > Chris Norman, CEO > > Digital Reality, Inc. > > 5118 Moss Garden Lane > > Katy, TX 77494 > > > > 512.297.5450 Mobile Direct > > 281-385-9727 Office > > <http://www.digitalrealitycorp.com> www.digitalrealitycorp.com > > > > > > From: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com] > On Behalf Of daleandee > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:59 PM > To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: Inexpensive (relatively > speaking) LSA Aircraft Options > > > > > > > > You can build a Sonex for less than 27K if you use the Aerovee or even > a Corvair conversion. The Sonex goes like stink on 80 HP and is still > Light Sport compliant with the Jab 3300 on it. > > In another life I did training as an AFI with USUA and used the > Challenger for a trainer. They are great fun to fly although a bit > squirrelly with the doors on. The Challenger is not a fast airplane so > they're not so great for cross-country flying, although many have been > flown for long distances. > > Dale > N28YD > > --- In Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:Sport_Aircraft%40yahoogroups.com> , "wj18001900" <swferris@> > wrote: > > > Has anyone considered a Quad City Challenger (or similar) aircraft > > as a low dollar entry point (relatively speaking) LSA aircraft > > option? One negative of course is that you cannot buy a brand new, > > ready to fly Quad City Challenger . . . you have to build it. As > > best I can figure, the total average cost to build a new Quad City > > Challenger II aircraft would range roughly between $27,000 +/- to > > $40,000 (including BRS chute, etc.) +/-. Probably able to build a > > Sonex for around the same price range. >

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___