Re: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: perfect for my situation

Back to the original Avweb news story; if one is going to make an offer where the product supply is limited, then that should have been stated; that's my view.  The story also leads one to believe a fuel burn of under 2.5 gph.  I do not believe that the general flying public will experience a fuel burn of less than 2.5 gph while using the airplane; that's my view.  To get blown all out of shape because someone points these things out, questioning statement made and is then called "stupid" is unfortunate and interesting insight to a company's behavior in response to inquires. 

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Coates
Sent: May 18, 2012 4:49 AM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: perfect for my situation

 

Rather than poo poo the fuel burn, take your time to check the NASA CAFE results and see for yourself in one of the most controlled competitions in the world. CAFE and NASA work out the results not the manufacturer. You really have to learn what your talking about cause it makes you look stupid!

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___