Helen
Back to the original Avweb news story; if one is going tomake an offer where the product supply is limited, then that should have beenstated; that's my view. The story alsoleads one to believe a fuel burn of under 2.5 gph. I do not believe that the general flying publicwill experience a fuel burn of less than 2.5 gph while using the airplane; that'smy view. To get blown all out of shapebecause someone points these things out, questioning statement made and is thencalled "stupid" is unfortunate and interesting insight to a company's behaviorin response to inquires.
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Coates
Sent: May 18, 2012 4:49 AM
To: Sport_Aircraft@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Light-Sport Aircraft Yahoo group Re: perfect for my situation
Rather than poo poo the fuel burn, take your time to check the NASA CAFE results and see for yourself in one of the most controlled competitions in the world. CAFE and NASA work out the results not the manufacturer. You really have to learn what your talking about cause it makes you look stupid!
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment